Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
ANZ J Surg ; 93(3): 656-662, 2023 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2307741

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on the optimal management of clavicle fractures, with advocates of both operative and non-operative management. The objective of this study is to assess the trends in the management of clavicle fractures in Australia over the past two decades. METHODS: The incidence of surgical fixation of clavicle fractures from 2001 to 2020 was analysed using the Australian Medicare Benefits Schedule database, reflective of operations performed on privately insured patients, thus excluding public patients and compensable cases. An offset term was utilized with data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics to account for population changes over the study period. RESULTS: A total of 17 089 procedures for the management of clavicle fractures were performed from 2001 to 2020. The incidence of operative intervention increased from 1.87 per 100 000 in 2001 to a peak of 6.63 per 100 000 in 2016. An overall increase was seen in males (310%) and females (347%) over the study period, as well as across all age groups. A greater proportion of operative interventions was performed on males (n = 14 075, 82%) than females (n = 3014, 18%, P < 0.001). The greatest increase in intervention was noted in those aged 65 or older (14% increase per year, 95% CI 11%-17%, P < 0.05). In 2020, the incidence of operative intervention decreased to a level last seen in 2013. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of operative interventions for clavicle fractures has increased in Australia over the 20-year study period. This increase is in keeping with recent evidence suggesting several advantages when displaced mid-shaft clavicle fractures are operatively managed.


Subject(s)
Fracture Fixation, Internal , Fractures, Bone , Male , Female , Humans , Aged , Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods , Clavicle/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Australia/epidemiology , National Health Programs , Fractures, Bone/epidemiology , Fractures, Bone/surgery , Fracture Healing
2.
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev ; 6(9)2022 09 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2057253

ABSTRACT

Sternoclavicular joint infections and osteomyelitis of the clavicle are extremely rare infections, especially in the pediatric population. Early signs of these infections are nonspecific and can be mistaken for common upper respiratory infections such as COVID-19 and influenza. Rapid diagnosis and treatment are critical for preventing potentially fatal complications such as mediastinitis. We present three cases of sternoclavicular joint infections in the past year during the COVID-19 pandemic. All three patients had delayed diagnoses likely secondary to COVID-19 workup. Each patient underwent surgical irrigation and débridement. Two of three patients required multiple surgeries and prolonged antibiotic courses. Placement of antibiotic-impregnated calcium sulfate beads into the surgical site cleared the infection in all cases where they were used. All three patients made a full recovery; however, the severity of their situations should not be overlooked. Children presenting to the hospital with chest pain, fever, and shortness of breath should not simply be discharged based on a negative COVID-19 test or other viral assays. A higher index of suspicion for bacterial infections such as clavicular osteomyelitis is important. Close attention must be placed on the physical examination to locate potential areas of concentrated pain, erythema, or swelling to prompt advanced imaging if necessary.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Osteomyelitis , Sternoclavicular Joint , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , COVID-19 Testing , Calcium Sulfate , Child , Clavicle/diagnostic imaging , Clavicle/microbiology , Clavicle/surgery , Delayed Diagnosis , Humans , Osteomyelitis/diagnosis , Osteomyelitis/drug therapy , Osteomyelitis/microbiology , Pandemics , Sternoclavicular Joint/diagnostic imaging , Sternoclavicular Joint/microbiology , Sternoclavicular Joint/surgery
3.
J Am Acad Orthop Surg ; 29(2): e72-e78, 2021 Jan 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-914687

ABSTRACT

The question about how to resume typical orthopaedic care during a pandemic, such as coronavirus disease 2019, should be framed not only as a logistic or safety question but also as an ethical question. The current published guidelines from surgical societies do not explicitly address ethical dilemmas, such as why public health ethics requires a cessation of nonemergency surgery or how to fairly allocate limited resources for delayed surgical care. We propose ethical guidance for the resumption of care on the basis of public health ethics with a focus on clinical equipoise, triage tiers, and flexibility. We then provide orthopaedic surgery examples to guide physicians in the ethical resumption of care.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Orthopedic Procedures/ethics , Public Health Administration/ethics , Adolescent , Aged , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee , COVID-19/epidemiology , Clavicle/injuries , Clavicle/surgery , Clinical Decision-Making , Female , Femoral Neoplasms/surgery , Fractures, Bone/surgery , Giant Cell Tumors/surgery , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Orthopedics , Pandemics , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Rotator Cuff Injuries/surgery , SARS-CoV-2 , Therapeutic Equipoise , Triage
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL